Sinon and Laocoön: Persuasion and Omen before the Sack
Catalogue ID: 04-trojan-cycle/036-sinon-laocoon-horse-debate
Cycle: Trojan
Version line: Epic Cycle — *Iliou Persis* (Proclus) / Apollodorean (+ Roman Vergilian transmission labeled for Laocoön)
Sources: Proclus, summary of the *Iliou Persis*; Apollodorus, *Epitome* 5.15–19; Vergil, *Aeneid* 2.40–249 (**Roman transmission** of Greek sack traditions—Laocoön’s snakes elaborated)
Source file: /workspace/greek-myth-catalogue/04-trojan-cycle/036-sinon-laocoon-horse-debate.md
Left behind as part of the ruse, Sinon (in the developed tradition) let himself be captured and spun a tale: Odysseus had marked him for sacrifice to ensure the army’s safe departure; he had escaped; the horse was an offering to Athena in recompense for the stolen Palladium—and if the Trojans harmed it, ruin would follow, but if they housed it, they might turn Athena’s favor and even invade Greece. Priam and the people believed him.
Laocoön, priest of Apollo (or Poseidon in some notices), opposed receiving the horse and struck it with a spear. While he sacrificed, two serpents came from the sea and killed his sons—and, in Vergil’s Roman epic telling, Laocoön himself as he tried to save them. The Trojans read the omen as punishment for impiety against the offering and dragged the horse in with festival joy. Cassandra’s clearer warnings still went unbelieved. Proclus’s *Iliou Persis* already knows the snake portent against Laocoön’s family as the hinge that seals Troy’s choice; Vergil stages Sinon’s rhetoric and the serpents as the emotional center of *Aeneid* 2’s Greek-derived sack prelude. Night and the open belly of the horse followed.